christians, anger and trump

I most often try to avoid commenting on anything political, especially on social media or from the pulpit.

Why? It’s not that I don’t have opinions. But I believe that politicians on either side will never solve our real national problems. The problems we have stem from people’s broken, selfish, sinful and rebellious human hearts. If we elected all Democrats into office, or all Republicans, would we solve our problems? No. Only spiritual renewal from God can fix this heart problem, and this world. I choose to talk about the ethics, life, resurrection and power of Jesus.

We are deeply polarized

America is at a rare, almost completely polarized place today. There is little room for middle ground. Pushed by constant media pressure, we have divided more and more into a tribal nation, where tribal “identity politics” rule. You must think like me or be on my team—otherwise I will come out against you. Each side makes Jesus a part of their political party, too. (he isn’t, as I write in The NPR Interview with Jesus). It’s a mess. Friends stop speaking. Families must avoid political discussions lest they go to war.

Again, why? Well, we feel less and less effective in handling the changes of our lives. We sense clearly that our government system is broken, but we are not sure how to fix it. Our political primary system has morphed into a place where the extremes of each party often pick polarizing candidates to run. Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump are prime examples—neither are easy people to respect, feel fond of, or vote for, in my opinion. Post-election, Donald Trump’s history, nature and methodology—whether you support him or not—cause widely diverging reactions. He is a New York billionaire who gets results by intentionally pushing buttons. This all leads to a time when people throw rational discussions to the gutter to attack the “other side” in passionate tirades. This is our American world.

This has touched the Evangelical Christian church, too. Recently, several Christians in highly visible positions have commented on the Trump Presidency. Mark Galli, outgoing Editor of Christianity Today, wrote an editorial stating that, on the grounds of immorality and dishonesty, Trump should be removed from office. It created a firestorm in conservative circles, and over 200 Christian pastors and leaders responded with an Open Letter in opposition to Galli’s position. People have repeatedly asked me to weigh in. How do I feel about Trump? About this or that “out-of-control” party. Even I must walk carefully around my friends and fellow pastors.

Avoiding the pressure

No matter the extreme, I try to keep my mouth shut (or limited) in public. I do have several biblical reasons why arguing politics, for or against any leader, is most often wrong. The reasons are:

• God remains in charge of the universe, which includes American politics.
• As Christians, we are called to reach out and treat others with respect and love, even when we differ.
• As Christians, we must guide our tongues and not speak curses at others.
• I am specifically called to be a “peace-maker” in a contentious world.

God is still in charge

Let me explain these points. First, to me Scripture clearly and repeatedly teaches that God remains in charge of human politics and even uses for his purposes godly and ungodly leaders (Ps. 75:7, Dan. 2:21, Prov. 8:15, Rom. 13). Therefore, the virulent issue of, “Is such-and-such a good or bad president?” doesn’t shake me much. This leader (and all others in the world) will be used by God for his plans. Can God use poor or even evil leaders? Of course. He has all through human history.

Evidence for this is found in the books of Daniel and John. Even though Daniel describes the deeds of very evil kings, he says in 2:21 that it is God who “removes kings and sets up kings,” and in 4:32, “The Most High rules the kingdom of men and gives it to whom he will.” So, according to Daniel even wicked kings should acknowledge that they have their position and authority only from God. The same thing is taught in the Gospel of John. Pilate, by whose authority Jesus was finally crucified, was a governing authority set and ordained by God (cf. Acts 2:23; 4:27, 28). In John 19:10 Pilate says to Jesus, “‘Do you not know that I have authority to release you and authority to crucify you?’ Jesus answered, ‘You would have no authority over me unless it had been given to you from above.'” Therefore, if Pilate, Nebuchadnezzar, and Darius were set in their places and given authority by God, even though they did much evil, then we have no reason to deny Paul’s assertion that “there is no authority except from God” (Romans 13:1).

Did God use Adolph Hitler? I was asked.  I offered that great evil like Hitler or Stalin or Mao shows us the level of fallenness in human hearts. Hitler’s Germany (which ultimately lost) was critical in establishing the nation of Israel, empowering many to rise above circumstances and do noble things for others, making the use of weapons of mass destruction less likely, forcing the establishment of the United Nations, developing the space program, etc. God has his hidden movements of blessings, too, I am sure. C.S. Lewis argued that God does not make evil into good but allows evil for a season so as to bring greater good from it. God plays for the long run.

Dialogue instead of anger

Secondly, the big loss here (my opinion) in our political environment is the total loss of decorum, dialogue, and tolerance. A medical truth explains why: significant emotion, including fear, loyalty or anger, block one’s ability to rationally weigh arguments. Psychologists have found again and again that reasonable and wise decisions require an ability to push the strongest emotions to the side.

It’s not that we can’t care. But strong emotions overwhelm your decision process. Appropriate decisions require a state of relaxed awareness, a state which is informed by passion but is not persuaded by it. Sadly, much of our 24-hour news cycle is designed to enflame passion, concerns, or anger. Both of the political camps are now so polarized that the new standard of American politics (and world politics) is based on emotionally attacking the other “tribe”. Reason and statesmanship go out the door into the cold, and so do family and friends who see the world differently.

angry_woman editedWe live in an angry world. Anger is one of the densest emotions and communicates our feelings deeply and quickly. It pushes people away, and so can create a sense of safety. It allows us to immediately feel more secure and in control (whether this is true or not). When used rarely and appropriately, it can force others to stop and rethink their position. But healthy anger requires a feedback loop—anger, listening, response, resolution. Anger in America has become unhealthy. Charles Duhigg, in The Atlantic, studied the recent research on anger. He writes,

America has always been an angry nation. We are a country born of revolution. Combat—on battlefields, in newspapers, at the ballot box—has been with us from the start. American history is punctuated by episodes in which aggrieved parties have settled their differences not through conversation, but with guns. And yet our political system was cleverly designed to maximize the beneficial effects of anger. The Bill of Rights guarantees that we can argue with one another in the public square, through a free press, and in open court. The separation of powers forces our representatives in government to arrive at policy through disagreement, negotiation, and accommodation. Even the country’s mythology is rooted in anger: The American dream is, in a sense, an optimistic reframing of the discontent felt by people unwilling to accept the circumstances life has handed them.

Recently, however, the tenor of our anger has shifted. It has become less episodic and more persistent, a constant drumbeat in our lives. It is directed less often at people we know and more often at distant groups that are easy to demonize. These far-off targets may or may not have earned our ire; either way, they’re apt to be less invested in resolving our differences…Without the release of catharsis, our anger has built within us, exerting an unwanted pressure that can have a dark consequence: the desire not merely to be heard, but to hurt those we believe have wronged us.

Proverbs reminds us that it is a gentle answer turns away wrath. As Christians, we must act differently. We must fight the ambient anger we breathe. We must become peacemakers, the non-anxious presence in a room of angry people.

We must work to tame our tongues

In James 3:7-11 we read:

No human being can tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison. With the tongue we praise our Lord and Father, and with it we curse human beings, who have been made in God’s likeness. Out of the same mouth come praise and cursing. My brothers and sisters, this should not be.

God expects that Christians should strive to watch over what they say. We are living in a time where “out loud” emoting, commenting, and posting happen with little thought. To be godly—James calls us to avoid cursing other people with the same mouth that praises God. As if we are to wisely reflect on which way down the path of the tongue we will choose to follow. The Greek word here (“should not be”) is a strong negative, used only here in the New Testament. The idea is that there should be no place in a Christian’s life for such condemning speech. When God transformed us, he poured into us the ability to speak redemption, not criticism. He gave us the capacity for new, redeemed, holy speech, and he expects us, as his children, to speak only that which is holy and right.

Blessed are the Peacemakers

Finally, Jesus specifically focuses our passions: “Blessed are the peacemakers.” As followers of Jesus, we are primarily to be about peace. “Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves, not looking to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others.” (Phil.2:3). This is our burdensome call, in a world where there is little harmony. Seeking peace means looking for common ground. It means striving to honor and respect all parties involved. It means looking for ways to reconcile and moderate our positions. It means listening to the other side and seeking their good.

Our goals as spiritual leaders must often be constrained in our public opinion, for we are under orders. We are to consider our relationships, both near and far, as considerably more valuable than our politics. We are to be known for our goodwill toward others, and our reconciliation of those far-off, not for our politics. Per Romans 12:16-21:

Do not be conceited. Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everyone. If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,” says the Lord.
On the contrary: “If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink…”  Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Does this really apply to politics? To today’s difficulties? What if a ruler is acting badly? Paul goes on in the very next verses (Romans 13:1-7):

Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which is established by God. The authorities that exist have been established by God.

As hard as this is, it is our belief system and appeal.  It seems clear and to the point, but there is more in the next few verses—just so that those under Rome’s harsh sword don’t miss it:

Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience.
This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God’s servants, who give their full time to governing. Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.

The Bible’s strong verbs are telling. We are to “be subject, avoid rebelling, act honorably, submit, pay, give respect, give honor” to those in authority. Yes, there may be times where we need to speak up against the government. In some situations, God endorses or approves of civil disobedience (see my post on A Short Theology of Civil Disobedience ). Still, it seems those times are rare, and come with specific instructions from heaven.

A trust in God which supersedes current situations is the overall theme here.

So, my brothers and sisters, here is my point in all this, and I may be wrong. Should Trump be removed (per Galli)? Or should we defend his religious-friendly policies (per the open response letter)? I don’t know—it is above my pay grade. But any time we speak out against a world leader and advocate their removal, we better be sure it is God is telling us to speak—not just our pent-up frustration. If we do stand against them, we must be willing to take the consequences (for example, jail or execution was ahead for Daniel, Paul, Peter, and Jesus). I remain committed to the fact that being a Christian is a high call; even more so as a pastor of the flock and a declarer of the Gospel. The highest.

It costs us something. Part of what we should consider in the cost is our freedom of expression, and our ability to join in with the polarizing rage of our day. Maybe, just maybe, we should trust God more, pray more, and bite our tongues more.


You may also like the humorous side of How Not to Argue.


  1. Thanks Brad for boldness – in grasping this nettle. We need to be able to hear people who have a differing view, without condemning their opinions.

  2. One thing my mom (who isn’t on social media at all) said to me recently is this: “When a person says something on social media, the only thing you know for sure is that their keyboard works.” She’s also one of the least tech-savvy people I know, so it’s a pretty profound statement on multiple levels.

  3. […] The clearest Bible teaching is that Christians ought to be model citizens, and submit to the government’s laws. This requires a proper perspective of who we are: citizens of heaven (Philippians 3:20). God promises us security in his kingdom, but not safety or prosperity in this world. We have exchanged our worldly rights for submission to God and His plan for us.  In fact, persecution and hate are often part of our faith journey (John 15:18-20). Our hope is solely in Jesus. In most cases, we should pray more and argue less (for more, see my post on Christians, Anger, and Trump). […]

  4. Pastor Brad. You did an excellent job in expressing a much needed perspective, and said it with much grace, but also very clearly made your points. Thank you for taking the time to do this. You sow good seed, it will bear good fruit. Blessings, brother!

  5. I am a Christian.
    Actually, it’s more accurate lately to say that I am still a Christian.
    I now say this with much trepidation. I say it with great fatigue. I say it somewhat begrudgingly. I say it with more than a good deal of embarrassment—not of Jesus, but of so many of his people and so much of the Church professing to speak for him.
    Looking around at too much of what represents my faith tradition, it’s become a daily battle to make this once effortless declaration, knowing that it now automatically aligns me with those who share so little in common with the Jesus I met when I first claimed the name Christian.
    I know the kind of people making this declaration now aligns me with in people’s minds. It now aligns me with bathroom bullies, politicized pulpits, white privilege, and overt racism; with bigotry toward so many groups of people who represent the “world” I grew up believing that God so loved.
    There are things that used to be a given as a follower of Jesus, that no longer are.
    For far too many people, being a Christian no longer means you need to be humble or forgiving. It no longer means you need a heart to serve or bring healing. It no longer requires compassion or mercy or benevolence. It no longer requires you to turn the other cheek or to love your enemies or to take the lowest place or to love your neighbor as yourself.
    It no longer requires Jesus.
    And so the choices are to abandon the idea of claiming Christ altogether to avoid being deemed hateful by association in the eyes of so much of the watching world—or to reclaim the name Christian so that it once again replicates the love of Jesus in the world.
    I am trying to do the latter.
    Yes, I am a Christian, but there is a Christian I refuse to be.
    I refuse to be a Christian who lives in fear of people who look or speak or worship differently than I do.
    I refuse to be a Christian who believes that God blesses America more than God so loves the world.
    I refuse to be a Christian who can’t find the beauty and truth in religious traditions other than my own.
    I refuse to be a Christian who uses the Bible to perpetuate individual or systemic bigotry, racism, or sexism.
    I refuse to be a Christian who treasures allegiance to a flag or a country or a political party, above emulating Jesus.
    I refuse to be a Christian who is reluctant to call-out the words of hateful preachers, venomous politicians, and mean-spirited pew sitters, in the name of keeping ceremonial Christian unity.
    I refuse to be a Christian who tolerates a global Church where all people are not openly welcomed, fully celebrated, and equally cared for.
    I refuse to be a Christian who speaks always with holy war rhetoric about an encroaching enemy horde that must be rallied against and defeated.
    I refuse to be a Christian who is generous with damnation and stingy with Grace.
    I refuse to be a Christian who can’t see the image of God in people of every color, every religious tradition, every sexual orientation.
    I refuse to be a Christian who demands that others believe what I believe or live as I live or profess what I profess.
    I refuse to be a Christian who sees the world in a hopeless spiral downward and can only condemn it or withdraw from it.
    I refuse to be a Christian devoid of the character of Jesus; his humility, his compassion, his smallness, his gentleness with people’s wounds, his attention to the poor and the forgotten and the marginalized, his intolerance for religious hypocrisy, his clear expression of the love of God.
    I refuse to be a Christian unless it means I live as a person of hospitality, of healing, of redemption, of justice, of expectation-defying Grace, of counterintuitive love. These are non-negotiables.
    Yes, it is much more difficult to say it these days than it has ever been, but I still do say it.
    I am still a Christian—but I refuse to be one without Jesus.

    • Dave, this is wonderfully written and deeply impactful to me. Deep wisdom here, and deep pain. I get it. I agree with your sentiments. Keep the faith–Jesus is rebuilding his church from the inside out. There are many I know who are seeking to walk the path of kindness, humility and compassion.

  6. This is an issue between good and evil not just Republican or Democrat. There is an egregious evil coming out of Washington DC and it needs to be exposed, resisted, and eliminated. And when God moves on this planet he usually does it through people. So to sit back and do nothing is unacceptable.

    • Thanks for this post. You make me pause and reflect. I think many people agree with you, William. I do think there is a great battle going on between good and evil–but I think our discernment of which side wears the white hat is suspect. The problem is that when humans define evil, we are influenced by our personal and world perspective. Some would define Trump as evil, some the Democratic party, some the Evangelicals who supported Trump, some the corporate/special interest/capitalist system, some the media, some the (pick) Jews-Whites-Blacks-Immigrants-Brazilians-whatevers. It makes human judgment skewed by background, education, and perspective. I think that the line between good and evil runs through every human heart, including mine. I am broken and yet redeemed. Fortunately, God always judges evil appropriately and perfectly. He is patient, seeing there is good and bad in all of us–and wanting us to grow and change. And you are also right about God using people most often. We each have our place and call and part to play. But he is the director-producer-play wright-set designer-timekeeper, working in a gazillion ways through all sorts of means. Maybe its just me, but I’m glad it doesn’t all depend on us.

  7. This is an issue between good and evil not just Republican or Democrat. There is an egregious evil coming out of Washington DC and it needs to be exposed, resisted, and eliminated. And when God moves on this planet he usually does it through people. So to sit back and do nothing is unacceptable.

  8. Thanks for your thoughts Brad. I do agree with so much and also with the beautiful heart it comes from. I also think it is important to respectfully and lovingly acknowledge that this is crafted through a lens of privilege. As you spoke of the role of religious leaders being to not take a side, I see a much different example from Martin Luther King. As white, heterosexual, cisgender American born people, we have the luxury of being able to choose when to be an ally for the oppressed and when to pull back. I want to be a peacemaker, but also not pull back from mimicking the audacious love of Jesus. This is a time when bickering between Christians and choosing politics over the great commission is rendering Christians voiceless to those who need the message of the Gospel the most. This to me is not a time to put our differences aside- it is a time to remind each other who we really are and our calling and purpose on this earth. This a traumatized culture desperately in need of the love and power and healing of the cross, but they see a church that stands against them. We have a responsibility as a church not just to be quiet and let people think what they think, but to deeply search our hearts and the word and the Father, Son and Spirit to ask what we should do and how we should respond. As peacemakers we should not start fires, but as believers I think there is no doubt that we need to rise and act to put out the fires that already exist. I received a Jesus who was totally controversial, who hung out with the “wrong” crowd, and turned over tables in the temple. I don’t disagree with a single thing you said, but it comes across a bit passive in my opinion. I would plead with your readers to not only seek peace in their lives and souls, but also to seek out and actively engage in relationships with people who are not like you and live out the love we are called to, which calls us over and above allegiance to or support of any political party. Neither party represents the Great Commission. We are called to a higher order. We are in this world but not of it. As we build relationships and rapport with others it is our compassion that drives our passion. That is the church I wish the world could see.

    • Jody, I love you thoughts here. I agree completely, and I confess that it sometimes feels a bit “willfully passive” to me. I am wired as a type-A Driver personality, and keeping my mouth shut isn’t easy. I also know that I am caught in my own culture–as much as I have sought to understand others. Without being defensive, let me agree with our need to engage with people who are unlike us. I have worked and lived in the poorest hovels of Africa, China, Peru, Mexico and India. I spend significant energy trying to love and support and listen to people who bring outside perspectives. My family and I care deeply, as best I know ourselves. But we are still white Americans. But here’s the difference–I don’t have to do this politically to find God’s smile on me. In this world but not of it. Well said. Jesus continues to grow his church broader and deeper. Keep at it, Lord, and at my heart. Blessing on you and yours.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s